For the Kremlin, the most obvious takeaway from the US seizure of Venezuelas Nicolas Maduro may be that its a blow to Russias regional influence and to the pride of Vladimir Putin: A prominent ally who concluded a strategic partnership pact with the Russian president in May is suddenly out of power and sitting in jail in New York City.

Maduros capture comes a little over a year after the fall of Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian leader who gave Russia a firm foothold in the Middle East in exchange for crucial support in the war against his opponents -- another big hit to Putins efforts to revive Moscows presence around the world after the retreat that followed the Soviet collapse.

Not only that, but the US raid in Venezuela on January 3 accomplished in a few hours something that Russia has been unable to do in the nearly four years since Putin launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine and that was seen as one of his key goals: Remove the leader of a country.

SEE ALSO:

As US Ratchets Up Pressure On Venezuela, Will (Or Can) Moscow Help Maduro?

But Russias focus on its war against Ukraine meant that protecting Maduro would not have been realistic, even if Moscow had wanted to do so, and Venezuelas usefulness for Russia had declined, at least in economic terms, because of sanctions and other factors that have driven down oil production, a sector in which Russia has major stakes.

And there are upsides for Russia. For one thing, Moscow can point to the US operation as evidence that Washington seeks to impose its will on other countries and flouts international law when it sees fit -- an argument that is convincing to some despite Moscows war against Ukraine.

In statements on January 3, the Russian Foreign Ministry said it was extremely concerned about what it called an act of armed aggression against Venezuela and urged the United States to release the legally elected president of a sovereign country and his wife.

But whats more important to the Kremlin than bolstering that portrayal of the United States, analysts say, is the hope that Washington's actions in Venezuela and US President Donald Trumps focus on the western hemisphere will give Moscow more latitude -- both morally and militarily -- to do as it desires in what it considers its own sphere of influence, particularly in Ukraine.

"Regardless of the decisions Vladimir Putin makes in Ukraine, it is becoming increasingly difficult to condemn certain actions on the basis of international law alone," Berlin-based political analyst Alexandra Sitenko, an expert on Russia's ties with Latin America and other regions, told RFE/RL.

'What Great Powers Do'

The widespread perception that the US operation violated international law is no bad thing for the wider Russian narrative,Mark Galeotti, a Russia analyst and honorary professor at University College London's School of Slavonic and East European Studies, said on his podcast on January 4.

After all, Putins view is essentially that this is what great powers do, and great powers have spheres of influence. And if we are going to let America have its Latin American sphere of influence, then the corollary is, we should be allowed our Slavic one, Galeotti said.

AddedSam Greene, a professor at the Russia Institute at Kings College London: Any frustration over seeing Maduro removed by Washington will be tempered by the promise of a global condominium -- in which Moscow would win the right to do the same in its own neighborhood.

Theres evidence that Russia has been seeking that kind of a quid pro quo since long before it launched its all-out war against Ukraine in February 2022.

SEE ALSO:

Venezuela Convulses And Russia Frets: What Does Moscow Stand To Lose If The Maduro Government Falls?

During a standoff in which Russia helped protect Maduro amid an effort by a US-backed opposition leader to oust him, the Russianswere signaling very strongly that they wanted to somehow make some very strange swap arrangement between Venezuela and Ukraine, Fiona Hill, who was the top Russia and Europe adviser on Trumps National Security Council from April 2017 to July 2019, told a Congressional committee in October 2019.

The thrust of the Russian messaging was, You want us out of your backyard. Well, you know, we have our own version of this. You're in our backyard in Ukraine, Hill said.

The Ukraine Factor

This time around, Russias approach and its relatively muted response to Maduros capture are part of a series of developments that show just to what extent Russias desire to subjugate Ukraine dictates the rest of its foreign policy,Hanna Notte, director for Eurasia at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, said on X.

Putin shunned cooperation with [former US President Joe] Biden in an effort to force him to abandon Ukraine. Over the past year, he's tried to stay in Trump's good graces, only this time to lure him into taking Russias side against Ukraine, Notte wrote.

Whether in wielding pressure or praise vis-a-vis a US leader, Russias end goal remained the same: Driving a wedge between the US and Ukraine.

SEE ALSO:

Ukraine Prepares For Crucial European Talks Amid Deadly Russian Attacks

While the tone and content of diplomacy on Ukraine can change fast, so far theres no been sign of a major shift in the US position since Maduros capture, which came amid multiple rounds of talks involving the US, Ukraine, Europe, and Russia in various configurations as the Trump administration seeks to broker an end to the war.

At a news conference hours after the operation in Caracas, Trump said he was not thrilled with Putin. Hes killing too many people. And on January 4, he echoed a CIA conclusion and said he did not believe Ukraine targeted one of Putins residences in a drone strike late last month -- after earlier seeming to accept the claim he said the Russian president relayed in a telephone conversation.

Does the focus on Venezuela and the western hemisphere mean that the United States is going to be distracted? Galeotti asked.

His answer: Certainly one can wonder how the claim that its going to run Venezuela can possibly be operationalized. But on the other hand, a superpower can indeed walk and chew gum at the same time. I dont think this is going to have any particular impact on what happens with Ukraine.

Greene suggested that if the Kremlin hopes for a broad understanding between major powers and free rein when it comes to Ukraine, it will be disappointed.

[U]nless carte blanche to act in Ukraine is forthcoming in short order, Moscow will chalk this down as standard American hypocrisy, likely souring the putative coalition of global hegemony between Putin, Trump and [Chinese President] Xi [Jinping], he wrote.